U.S. Anti-Piracy Votes Delayed After Protests
Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid said he must postpone a test vote set for Tuesday "in light of recent events." Those events included a petition drive by Google that attracted more than seven million participants and a one-day blackout by the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.
House Judiciary Committee chairman Lamar Smith, a Republican, quickly followed suit, saying consideration of a similar House bill would remain postponed "until there is wider agreement on a solution."
The Senate's Protect Intellectual Property Act and the House's Stop Online Piracy Act receive strong support from the entertainment industry and other businesses that lose billions of dollars annually to intellectual property theft and online sales of counterfeit products.
But they also face strong opposition from Internet-related companies that argue the bill would lead to over-regulation and censorship of the Internet.
Reid met with at least a half-dozen senators who sponsor the bill and announce that they now oppose it.
Piracy costs billions
Reid said counterfeiting and piracy cost the American economy billions of dollars every year and "there is no reason that the legitimate issues raised by many about this bill cannot be resolved." Reid said he felt optimistic about reaching a compromise in the coming weeks.The main Senate sponsor, Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, said he respected Reid's decision to postpone the vote but lamented the Senate's unwillingness to debate the bill.
"The day will come when the senators who forced this move will look back and realize they made a knee-jerk reaction to a monumental problem," said Leahy. Criminals in China, Russia and other countries "who do nothing but peddle in counterfeit products and stolen American content are smugly watching how the United States Senate decided" that debating the bill proved worthless.
The two bills would allow the Justice Department, and copyright holders, to seek court orders against foreign websites accused of copyright infringement. They would bar online advertising networks and payment facilitators such as credit card companies from doing business with an alleged violator. They also would forbid search engines from linking to such sites.
The Tuesday vote centered around whether to move the legislation to the Senate floor for debate. A statement made on Thursday, by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, stated it too early to consider the bill. Alongside the recent desertions it appeared supporters lacked the 60 votes needed to advance the measure.
McConnell on Friday applauded Reid's decision, saying it would "prevent a counterproductive rush toward flawed legislation."
Opponents relieved
In the House, Smith said he "heard from the critics" and resolved that " … we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products." Smith plans to hold further committee votes on his bill next month.The bill's opponents felt relieved for the delay.
Markham Erickson, executive director of NetCoalition, commended Congress for "recognizing the serious collateral damage this bill could inflict on the Internet."
The group represents Internet and technology companies including Google, Yahoo! and Amazon.com. Erickson said they would work with Congress "to address the problem of piracy without compromising innovation and free expression."
Republican representative Darrell Issa, who joins Democratic senator Ron Wyden in proposing an alternative anti-piracy bill, credits opponents with forcing lawmakers "to back away from an effort to ram through controversial legislation."
But the CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America, former Connecticut Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, warned that, "as a consequence of failing to act, there will continue to be a safe haven for foreign thieves."
The MPAA, which represents such companies as Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., leads the advocacy for the anti-piracy legislation.
SOURCE:
No comments:
Post a Comment