O.K. "Ontological Kapital."
"The magician of the future will use mathematical formulas." - Aleister Crowley.
מחיים אותו
עצמו אותו
We start by saying the subject corresponds to the predicate.
Kapital [is] ontological.
Here is an a priori philosophy which is mathematical.
a = b
To deepen our understanding of Kapital we further equation.
a² = ab
a² + a² = a² + ab
2a² = a² + ab
2a² - 2ab = a² + ab - 2ab
2 (a² - ab) = 1 (a² - ab)
The equation is of the dimensions of Kapital.
a² Kapital has two dimensions.
ab [is] being.¹
¹. [presence implies being]: we will dissolve this being once the being has considered its presence.
a² = ab
The two dimensions of Kapital which constitute the essential substance of Kapital is an assemblage of essence to essence.
a² + a² = a² + ab
The two dimensions of Kapital [exist]² joined to each other rendering the two dimensions of Kapital as joined.
². Once again, presence implies being.
2a² = a² + ab
The two dimensions of Kapital [are] brought together in the centre by the same networked system of organization constituting the interior and exterior of Kapital. In this way, Kapital has an interior and an exterior. The centre [is] to the interior of its [being], the environment [is] to the exterior of its [being]. The centre holds the structure whilst the environment [is] what [is] surrounding.
2a² - 2ab = a² + ab - 2ab
The sentience of the centre [is] linked to the sentience of its surrounding region to the substance of the [being] of Kapital. Sentience [is] the substance of how we make a living, especially in the commercial world where we [are] increasing the body of Kapital. The larger the body of Kapital, the better its ability to support us.
2 (a² - ab) = 1 (a² - ab)
The interior of Kapital [is] renewable: the flux of the sign, its symbolic exchange. The exterior of Kapital [is] fixed: value. As I have said elsewhere, it seems pertinent here to cite, the terrorism of value eradicates [being]. Values compose certain laws in accordance with the principle that governs reality. The values to prove that Kapital [is] ontological are indeed 2 = 1. The two dimensions of Kapital indeed form a structure. Even if the difference exists in our conceived notions of these dimensions, they conform not only to the other, but confirm the other.
Now, if we say that the subject does not correspond to the predicate then we can create a contradiction to draw the lines of a syllogism. All we have to do [is] reverse the equation.
Values clash with each other to create the differences between the numbers.
1 (ab + a²) ≠ 2 (ab + a²)
So, the reverse must share a similar truth, in a certain sense. Say, the interior of Kapital [is] static, the sign [is] not³ exchangeable. Then the exterior of Kapital is in flux: the value [becomes] exchangeable.
³. "is" [becoming] "if" ...
What happens to the law of value in correspondence with the principle of reality?
What happens when it corresponds to hyperreality?
Hyperreality [is] the simulation of current reality. The simulation and the code of hyperreality absorb our knowledge of reality. The principle below reality [is] not up to date. Now we [are] governed by simulation. The simulacrum replaces ideology; the disappearance of the purposes by which we [are] nourished. The system by which we currently live - the contemporary epoch, the digital age, the age of simulation - delights us with its hegemony of simulacra. The sequence occurs when the law of value corresponds to hyperreality. All denominations of value - truth, purpose, meaning, production - [are] swallowed up by the flux of signs floating around the exterior of Kapital while the inner sign (or, from inside the sign) [is] fixed. "The rest is a universal simulation world in which capital functions as a gigantic devaluation machinery."⁴
⁴. Huyssen, A. (1989) "In The Shadow of McLuhan: Jean Baudrillard's Theory of Simulation." Assemblage, No. 10; p. 16.
The sign attached to its core [is] its absolute, its universal. The flux of signs that emanate from a fixed sign [are] the peculiarities of Kapital. Back to isolated symbolic forms:
2ab - ab + a² ≠ 2ab + 2a²
The substance surrounding the sentience of Kapital disconnects from the center of its sentience.
ab - a² ≠ 2a²
The external and internal dimensions of Kapital mirror each other to produce an identity between the exterior and the interior.
The surrounding [is] not containing everything except the definition of Kapital's [being]. Surrounding the surrounding [is] nothing.
a² - ab ≠ a² - a²
The separation of the singular dimension of Kapital, its totality, distinguishes its two overlapping dimensions, its duality, vis-à-vis, its capacity for rationality, which means the two dimensions of Kapital which [are] intertwined can also exist as two separate entities in their own right⁵.
⁵. "own right," own way.
ab ≠ a²
The two essences that make up the distinct substance of Kapital, these two essences [are] distinct. They are two distinct "epistemes" that make up the Logos⁶ of a singular '-ontos⁷.
⁶. "conditional liberty," the agency behind the word.
⁷. Ontos: singular; entity; ontology.
In the words of Michel Foucault, we have created "a naive model, a partial and insufficiently generalized sketch of a more abstract, or more powerful theory, or existing at a higher level "retracing" proximities, dependencies, subordinations, progressive formalizations and general self-wrapping."⁸
⁸. Foucault, M. (1989) The Archaeology of Knowledge. Oxon: Routledge; p. 209.
What we are trying to do [is] "to reveal a whole series of differences, relationships, gaps, changes, independence and autonomy in the analysis of the episteme."⁹ An episteme of Kapital [is] an essence of Kapital, the structure of the form which [is] relative to the other by means of it being identical. An episteme of Kapital imposes on the other episteme of Kapital the same standards, the same general scene of reason, and the same structure of thought, only by means of an inversion.¹⁰
⁹. Ibid., pp. 210-11.
¹⁰. Ibid., p. 211.
An essence of Kapital [is]: "The total set of relationships that unite to manifest the sovereign unity of a subject, the set of relationships that can be discovered that opens up an inexhaustible field to cover an indefinite field of relationships. A constantly moving set of joints, offsets, and coincidences that are established, to give rise to others. The analysis of the episteme questions its existence."¹¹
¹¹. Ibid., p. 211-12.
Now, if we say that the subject is relative to the predicate then we can create a subordinate of the contradiction to continue drawing the lines of the syllogism, like the square of opposition.
ab ≈ a²
The Logos of Kapital [is] the replication of the sign of Kapital. The sign [is] replicated when there [is] a corresponding meaning between the two essences; one essence must correspond to the other essence to form an ontological structure. The ontological structure then becomes the carrier sign. In this way, when the two epistemes combine to make a single structure, the ontological carrier sign, then the ontological carrier sign can become its own distinct episteme. It [is] then part of a larger structure which [is] brought together by a large ontological attractor.
Thus, the case [is] not that Kapital [is] in two dimensions (a²), in itself, but that its two dimensions, uniting essences, or epistemes, [are] linked to the increasing capacity of its ontology (a x b).
a² - ab ≈ a² - a²
If the sign of Kapital can reproduce to [be] part of a larger structure, then the sign of Kapital can also separate from the ontological sign to reduce the overall meaning of the sign-carrier and produce differentiation. This process allows for a means of exchange which will take place according to the flux of signs. If the Kapital grows, its ontological structure [is] greater due to the repetition of the signs and their movement towards a greater attractor in even greater numbers. This floods the plane of meaning with homogeneity. When the duplication of signs has reached its critical limit, there [is] no more space available for variance, and for Kapital to remain abundant, it requires the resource of variation, much like the choice of consumers (or better stock options).
When the ontological structure has reached its maximum capacity for the meaning of the same model then the ontological structure must self-regulate to make room to guarantee exchange.
A separation of the essence from the substance allows difference.
Difference allows variance. And the variance allows the entirety of Kapital to recover heterogeneity in the ontological. The two-dimensionality of Kapital - the area where signs can either duplicate and repeat or separate and reduce themselves - this two-dimensionality of Kapital relates to its ability to respond to its ontology.
ab - a² ≈ 2a²
The ontological structure of Kapital [is] singularly epistemological despite being two-dimensional. The duplication of the sign of Kapital, contained in the aspect of the part which is unidimensional, during the replication and transferred to the aspect of the two dimensions, the duplication of the sign of Kapital [is] relative towards the domain of the aspect of functional Kapital. The sign of Kapital [is] in flux outside the ontological structure. The interior of the structure is empty and has been emptied of all meaning to make space available for reinscription and the start of a new stage of meaning.
2ab - ab + a² ≈ 2ab + 2a²
The ontological structure of Kapital, when emptied of meaning, [is] relative to this identical structure, the structure after having undergone its own duplication which creates a vacuum which [is] filled containing the variation of meaning. The first episteme which constitutes ontological Kapital [is] redundant while its relative episteme has become abundant. Redundancy increases in proportion to abundance as signs [are] either expelled by the void from the centre of the structure to colonize the exterior or pulled towards the centre to form the larger, more concentrated structure, which [is] built by the centripetal attractor.
1 (ab + a²) ≈ 2 (ab + a²)
Exchange at the heart of the ontological structure of Kapital [is] relative to exchange outside the structure. The relation of the interior sign of ontological Kapital the exterior sign of ontological Kapital [is] that of value; the first [is] fixed and the second [is] in motion. These signs [are] linked to each other through the equivalence of value. The universal [is] what makes Kapital ontological. There [are] characteristics of Kapital and their variance giving the difference of Kapital. Definitely, if we pose that there [is] a fundamental difference between the subject and the predicate then we can create a final subordinate to join all the lines of the syllogism, to make complete the square of opposition.
2 (a² - ab) ∂ 1 (a² - ab)
To observe Kapital as a partial differential, to what makes it equal, [is] to dismantle the structure which [is] ontological. This indicates the parts of its total, as opposed to the visualization of the structure as the sum of its components, which causes it to become anontological, the partial anontological difference of Kapital. If we remove from ontological Kapital the capacity of its sign to rotate, its capacity for duplication-repetition or separation-reduction, the sign disappears and becomes non-existent and the [being] of Kapital becomes latent. The only ontological substance of Kapital differs from its two epistemes in that two essences cannot combine unless a constant revolution of the sign is inherent in Kapital.
2a² - 2ab ∂ a² + ab - 2ab
The variance [is] produced in the ontological domain, to return to the formula of the interior and the exterior. Meaning within the ontological structure of Kapital and the meaning on the surface of its ontological structure generates an amplified domain of meaning. This has the ability to either manifest or eliminate signs according to its own duplication-repetition process or separation-reduction process.
2a² ∂ a² + ab
The capacity of the ontological domain of duplicity [is] based on the tendency to identify the Kapital of ontology with its constitutive system of epistemology. If the structure can reproduce, it relies on the aspect of Kapital which [is] two-dimensional to acquire the model of meaning which proliferates thus making the Logos of Kapital transferable.
ab + a² ∂ a² + a²
When the two essences, or epistemes, [are] conjoined to make a substance - a substance which is made up of the partial difference - when the two essences [are] conjoined to make a substance, this [is] what [is] signified by the sign-carrier of the ontological structure of Kapital, the variance [is] again recognized in the differences between the values which are fixed, according to the static signs and the values which are exchangeable, according to the signs which are in movement.
a² ∂ ab
The ontological structure of Kapital produces variance so, between inside and outside, the difference can [exist] which allows the flotation, reinterpretation, and rewriting of signs to create constantly changing values, values which not only form a body, a body of epistemology, but a body of epistemology which describes Kapital and its ontology.
The next logical step would [be] to take Kapital and its ontology and apply it to the society governed by Kapital. What we [are] in the business of advancing [is] the concept of its dimension.
a = c
The society governed by Kapital [is] represented by hyperreality.
a³ = ac
a³ + a³ = a³ + ac
3a³ = a³ + ac
3a³ - 3ac = a³ + ac - 3ac
3 (a³ - ac) = 1 (a³ - ac)
a³ : The society governed by Kapital [is] represented by a multidimensional character in layers.
ac [is] hyperreality.
In the view of the realistic objective, the theoretical models which [are] defined can share the way in which the society governed by Kapital [is] structured. This [is] the aspect of hyperreality, the mode of society which [is] linked to other conceptual systems and [are] a basic principle of philosophical realism.
a³ = ac
The phenomenal view of hyperreality [is] represented by a conceptual system as such, a grid that [is] three-dimensional. In this way, it reflects the multidimensional layered character of the Kapital-governed society. The structure of hyperreality [is] an extension and projection of the society governed by Kapital. Hyperreality represents the objects of Kapital as well as their relationships to each other.
a³ + a³ = a³ + ac
Organisms, layered multidimensional structures, inherent in other entities, layered multidimensional structures whose properties consist of an ideal form of Kapital. Each form which emanates from the one ideal form represents objects of Kapital which imitate a certain aspect of the ideal correspondence for the absolute sign of Kapital, an emanation of the hyperrealist. In this way, hyperreality includes layered multidimensionalities; The personalities who interact with Kapital.
3a³ = a³ + ac
These interacting personalities, multidimensionalities, layers of Kapital, [are] networking singularities that decode and recode the values of signs, flux signs, which exchange around the nodes in local networks to transmit a modified signal of the code inside other singularities. It is that the critical theorist, Jean Baudrillard, calls social flows. All of these networking peculiarities include the special properties of "communicative capitalism." The hyperrealistic dimension contains the absolute sign, an emanation of the consumption process, constituting its simulacrum, an algorithm of the reality of simulation.
3a³ - 3ac = a³ + ac - 3ac
Hyperreality has no place in a singular dimension; unidimensionality is not nodal but it always transmits a signal. A social flow requires harmony and reciprocity. The interacting personalities of the Kapital-governed society enlarge the simulated dimension when a critical mass of signs appreciate in value again modifying the signal. A return to the multidimensional [is] a return to the nodal where social flows [are] unstable. The absolute sign of Kapital depreciates as the values inherent in the process of consumption also depreciate with it.
3 (a³ - ac) = 1 (a³ - ac)
The layers of the society governed by Kapital and its multidimensionality [are] built on the restructuring of reality, its change of form in the simulated construction of hyperreality. The shape of the structure presents an active behaviour which [is] of the environment, according to the symbolic exchange of Kapital, but also of the organization, affected by the flow of signs emanating from inside and outside floating. Each sign [is] met by its sign equivalent to nodal points of the singularity in the multidimensionality of the grid; an economic valence of interchangeability. In the words of Jean Baudrillard: "This structure ... will no longer be directly linked to a more or less pre-assigned pre-inventory state, but analyzed as an element of social [Kapital] tactics" whether individual or bodily, "Which in a larger structure can then coincide with other aspects"¹² of what makes it total.
¹². Baudrillard, J. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Telos Press; pp. 35 - 36.
Again, if we say that the subject does not correspond to the predicate then we can create a contradiction to trace the lines of the syllogism.
Again, all we have to do [is] reverse the equation. Let's see how the reverse brings its own truth.
1 (ac + a³) ≠ 3 (ac + a³)
Through a process of reorganization, the society governed by Kapital, due to its artificial nature, retains the ability to deconstruct its multidimensional nature from the environment, transfer of layers to other constituent structures, from the emanation of its centrality, an alternative movement by coding and recoding of signs to its exteriority. It [is] impossible to design any other structure, except for the sign that Kapital [is] located beneath. A valence of signs makes Kapital nodal. Its equivalence makes it fair. How [is] Kapital social? Hyperreality [is] its totality, the network of nodal singularity, the flow of signs [is] the corporality of society governed by Kapital, its body, while personal exchange [is] contained at the level of its individuality.
3ac - ac + a³ ≠ 3ac + 3a³
If Kapital [is] independent of the human spirit, does Kapital have a spirit of its own? Does it have its own mind in the sense of its property rights over the minds of its subjects? We work on the assumption that knowledge of Kapital depends on human and social constructions. Kapital takes on an independent form of mind, but cannot be accessed through the mental constructs attributed to it. So is it malleable? Kapital [becomes] the abstract object of its own contemplation. It gains its own plenipotenitial construction from a combination of its network of social constructions.
Kapital belongs to the paradigm where properties and relationships contain copies of particular objects. The details of Kapital, like money, surplus, or value, for example, even extending to power and its symbol - that which conceals the ephemera - participate in its form. Material Kapital [is] simply a copy of ideal Kapital; everything invested in the ideal can manifest itself in the real, a reality of materiality descending from ideality, the warehouse of hyperreality, where Kapital [is] always present, but its forms [are] transient, moving along the copy upon the copy. What [is] in flux must become what [is] fixed and what [is] fixed must go in flux; together a cycle of ideal material [becoming] Kapital [is] once again returning to the ethereal.
{ Unfinished manuscript }
§
מָ֞ג
{ ... }
No comments:
Post a Comment