{ ... }

۞

“Anontology dwells on the Nothing, the being without being, that renders us tense without presence, absence without presence,” said Mister O'Niste to Witham Sispa, in another faint and dithering whisper.  

“Or does it render us absent with its prescience?” Witham Sispa retortèd.  

“Anontology can harldy be,” said a third party, “because because cannot be because because causes the being not to be, compared to an ontological anarchy.”  

When a third party, a third party who has no relation to the story, is attempting to explain something ontological then it appears as an ontological scandal.  

“That's the thing about the thing.” O'Niste, again dithering.  

The third party refrainèd from interrupting.  

Ding!  Ding!  Ding!  

Not ablanathanalba, more like Martin Heidegger!  Heidegger's "ding."  

۝